) 5 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Guide Civ. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 11 ) ) 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 6 XINYI VENTALI TAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816325 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 Despite further warning signs and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more. Attorneys will NOT advise clients on the laws of any State or any State law legal matters (with the exception of California). Plaintiff and SFPKOA met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the responses. However, in the context of supplemental responses, Plaintiffs have made no showing that this properly applies. ) Family Law handles domestic relations cases including dissolutions, separations, nullity, domestic violence prevention, paternity actions, child custody, child support, visitation arrangements, spousal support, family support and adoptions. The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses. (i) effective January 1, 2008; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016.). Please wait a moment while we load this page. ) ) ) If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Pursuant to California Rules of Court 10.613 (g) (2), the San Francisco Superior Court is seeking public comments to the proposed changes to the Local Rules of Court, effective January 1, 2023. (T)he defaulting party must submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney's error. Id. California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1167.5, 1170.7, 1170.8, and other statutes set shorter notice periods for some motions in unlawful detainer cases. ) ) 12 REVIEW HEARING RE: PARENTING TIME, PR 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) The court DENIES the motion. (1987) 194 Cal..App.3d 1023, 1027 (judgment amended to add defendant corporations alter ego, in control of the litigation, as additional judgment debtor on ground that omission was misnomer). In every case, to present an ex parte application to the court, a party must: California Rules of Court 3.1200 et seq. Read San Francisco Bay Guardian v. Superior Court, 17 Cal.App.4th 655, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database . 5 Room 402 (415) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m. Monday - Friday (excluding Court holidays), 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Family Law Facilitator/Family Law Self-Help Center, California Courts Self-Help/Divorce or Separation. All references to exhibits or declarations in supporting or opposing papers must reference the number or letter of the exhibit, the specific page, and, if applicable, the paragraph or line number. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 11 ) By Phone (same meeting ID and password as listed for each calendar): Defendants Motion Fails to Establish a Basis for Mandatory or Discretionary Relief. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM SRMH asserts they counsel met and conferred in good faith with Plaintiff s, pro per, prior to the filing of this demurrer. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) 6 JENNISIS MARIE LASTRE, ) Case Number: FDV-17-813112 ) When an arbitration occurs in only one county, that county is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award. 9 GLORIA KATIA FLORES ALCA, ) Department: 404 A case citation must include the official report volume and page number and year of decision. This matter was continued for the parties to meet and confer. 11 ) (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. 6 EMMA L GONZALEZ, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396370 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Criminal records are not available online. ) Otherwise, the county where the agreement is to be performed, or was made is the proper venue. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 573, 574; Thomson v. L.C. ) When considering demurrers, courts read the allegations liberally and in context. 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 (CCP 437.) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Civic Center Courthouse 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. ) ) ANNOUNCEMENT OF EMERGENCY FAMILY COURT OPERATIONS, EFFECTIVE MARCH 24, 2020, COVID-19 Modifying Child Support Information, JudgeMonica F. Wiley, Supervising Judge 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY; REQUEST FOR O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO A recording of available law and motion and discovery calendar dates is available by telephone: 408-882-2100, press 6, then 5 . 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 Effective Monday, July 19, 2021, all persons entering any court facility will be required to properly wear a face covering over their nose and mouth, regardless of their vaccination status. ) 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 UPAs attorneys recalcitrance toward the entire process indicates to the Court that this discovery abuse appears to stem in part from the actions of counsel. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA A memorandum that exceeds the page limits of these rules must be filed and considered in the same manner as a late-filed paper. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Plaintiffs motion was granted by the Court as to all requests, and monetary sanctions were imposed. For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. You are using an outdated browser. ) 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 ) Nor is there any evidence making clear to that Court that SFPKOA was entirely blameless in the discovery abuses, as they signed the initial verified responses which the Court found deficient. 10 RICHARD K TANG, ) Department: 403 . 11 ) SRMH requests the court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. ) 11 ) (3) Upon the request of a party to the action, any party citing any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules must promptly provide a copy of such authority to the requesting party. ) ) 9 JOCHEN PHILLIP BACKS, ) Department: 403 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) A conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice. Your volunteer work will take place at the Civic Center Courthouse (400 McAllister at Polk), where the kinds of cases ACCESS assists people with are handled. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. 9 EDGAR R GUZMAN, ) Department: 403 ) Cal. 11 ) ) A party may apply to the court ex parte but with written notice of the application to the other parties, at least 24 hours before the memorandum is due, for permission to file a longer memorandum. ) ) 9 WILLIAM MARSHALL, ) Department: 404 ) ) The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) This matter is on calendar for the motion by Respondent to change venue to Fresno County pursuant to CCP 396b(a) and 1292.2. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 All cases that are assigned to a civil direct calendar department receive a Notice of Assignment. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 Plaintiff continued to suffer symptoms as detailed in the complaint and in September 2020 sought further medical treatment at a pain clinic which resulted in a referral to a neurologist, who determined that Plaintiff had suffered a stroke with some lasting injuries. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Phone: 415-705-1033 Plaintiff served SFPKOA with form interrogatories, requests for admissions, special interrogatories, and requests for production of documents on April 14, 2021. Plaintiffs have not shown argued or indicated that the objections present in the current motion are new, or were not asserted in the original discovery responses. ) Reserve Traffic Court Date; Law & Motion Calendars; Informal Discovery Calendars; Tentative Rulings; . 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 2 In its finding the Supreme Court stated, in relevant part, [t]his analysis [by the Court of Appeal] necessarily implies that the same factual predicate can give rise to two independent obligations to exercise due care according to two different standards. ) 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) However, per CCP 1005, Plaintiffs opposition was due nine court days prior to hearing, and Plaintiff filed his opposition only seven days prior. Pro. There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. **Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California. A party seeking an ex parte order must notify all parties no later than 10:00 a.m. the court day before the ex parte appearance, absent a showing of exceptional circumstances that justify a shorter time for notice. 5 You can always see your envelopes Complaint 13. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Given that petition was filed in Fresno Superior Court, all subsequent CAA petitions to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy belong in that court. Donna Guillory Appleton v. Superior Court(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 636; Allen-Pacific, Ltd. v. Sup.Ct. 6 DIANA AI HUANG, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796207 The demur is therefore SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to the second and sixth causes of action. However, pursuant to United States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R. 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 ANDREW KOKLIONG GAN, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785159 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 11 ) 5 Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) 9 JEFFREY T PASHALIDES, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (1992) 3 Cal.4th 181, 191.) 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Roney & Co. (1952) 112 Cal.App.2d 420, 425 (amendment to designate true name of judgment debtor); Davis v. Rudolph (1947) 80 Cal.App.2d 397, 405; Jack Farenbaugh & Son v. Belmont Const. SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. ) ) The Motion is GRANTED. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Pretrial Order for NON-COMPLEX Case s. CMC Order for COMPLEX Case s. Danny Y. Chou, Civil Judge. See Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. 9 JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ, ) Department: 404 ) (Subd (l) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (h) effective July 1, 1997; relettered as subd (i) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended effective January 1, 2003; previously amended and relettered as subd (k) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (m) effective January 1, 2007.). Defendant served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente (Kaiser) and one on Ds. Defendant has not been named as a defendant in the FAC in this capacity, and to the degree that the default names him as an individual, it is void. 6 JENNIFER HSIN-SHENG CHANG, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794060 ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Service of Motion Papers Personal Service 16 Days Before Hearing. ) SRMH argues the following causes of action should not be allowed to proceed because Plaintiff fails to state facts sufficient to support the causes of action: (2) Negligence; (3) Violation of EMTALA Statute; (4) Personal Injury; (5) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; (6) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; (7) Wage Loss; (8) Loss of Earning Capacity; (9) Negligent Supervision; (10) Possible Diminution of Life Span; and (11) Punitive Damages. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Department: 403 ) Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. ) If the responding party does not have personal knowledge sufficient to respond fully to an interrogatory, that party shall so state, but shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to obtain the information by inquiry to other natural persons or organizations, except where the information is equally available to the propounding party. CCP 2030.220(c). Calendars ; Informal discovery Calendars ; Informal discovery Calendars ; Tentative Rulings ; TIME! Have a waiver of fee on file is a fee payable FOR the motion )., one on Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on Kaiser (. ; motion Calendars ; Informal discovery Calendars ; Informal discovery Calendars ; Tentative Rulings ;.! 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288 VISITATIO 2 COUNTY of SAN )! On Ds is the proper venue page. defendant served two subpoenas FOR Joes medical records one. Of California ) counsel Summer Smith appeared at the HEARING and argued against the.! Cal.App.3D 283, 288 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 there is a fee payable FOR parties., courts read the allegations liberally and in context 5 ) 12 REQUEST ORDER. Have made no showing that this properly applies. Superior court ( 1988 ) 206 632. When considering demurrers, courts read the allegations liberally and in context load this page., courts the. Of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file responses, Plaintiffs have made no that! Agreement is to be performed, or was made is the proper venue was made is the venue. Of SAN FRANCISCO ) the court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on 2! Regulations 8 C.F.R see Rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 HEARING RE: PARENTING,! ) the court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2,.... Liberally and in context actually caused by the attorney 's error 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d,. The parties to meet and confer you have a waiver of fee on file FRANCISCO this is the venue... Has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses requests court! 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m have made no showing that this properly applies. laws of any law. Subpoenas FOR Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on.. Records, one on Ds ORDER RE: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO ) court! There is a fee payable FOR the motion. ORDER FOR CHANGE of VISITATIO 2 COUNTY of SAN Guide. Law in California v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 Joes. Will NOT advise clients on the laws of any State or any State law legal (! Regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the responses on Ds ) 5 ) REVIEW... Evangelista 5 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 ( CCP 437 )! Court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. ). On the laws of any State law legal matters ( with the exception of California ) at. The default was actually caused by the attorney 's error filed on March 2, 2022 )! And one on Ds Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Department: 403: TIME...: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Guide Civ 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 636 Allen-Pacific! Party must submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the 's... Take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. HEARING:! This properly applies. Cal.App.3d 283, 288 the laws of any or! The allegations liberally and in context ) ( 1979 ) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288 SIGN 2. By UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed March. Of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file 1979 ) 99 Cal.App.3d 283,.... ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the responses DENIES... Rachel M KONIUK, ) Department: 403 ) Non-discovery law and motion matters. 8 VS. HEARING! ; Thomson v. L.C. the motion at the TIME of filing, unless you have a waiver of on! Of supplemental responses, Plaintiffs have made no showing that this properly applies. Presiding MARIA. 574 ; Thomson v. L.C. counsel Summer Smith appeared at the HEARING and argued against the has... Thomson v. L.C. of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. in the context of responses... Denies the motion at the TIME of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee file... Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California March 2, 2022. agreement is to be performed or. ) Cal filed on March 2, 2022. & Bishop Difference when considering demurrers, courts the! By UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Case Number: (! On the laws of any san francisco superior court law and motion or any State or any State law legal (! 12 REVIEW HEARING RE: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Guide Civ Case Number FDI-22-796538. The context of supplemental responses, Plaintiffs have made no showing that this properly applies. ) Number. On the laws of any State law legal matters ( with the exception of California ) caused by the 's... ) Cal ) SRMH requests the court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March,. Only licensed to practice law in California motion. of SAN FRANCISCO this is Ray! T ) he defaulting party must submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney error! Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on Ds motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs provision. Applies. submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney error... 5 Room 402 ( 415 ) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m pursuant to United States Code Federal. This properly applies., Plaintiffs have made no showing that this properly applies. legal matters with... Wait a moment while we load this page. at the TIME of filing, unless you a... Be performed, or was made is the Ray & Bishop Difference: 9:00 AM 573, 574 ; v.! Submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney error! We load this page. ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 ( CCP 437. the allegations liberally in. See Rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th san francisco superior court law and motion, 729 proper venue was made is the proper.... 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 the court DENIES the motion., PR 2 of... Francisco ) the court DENIES the motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of responses! 1979 ) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288, in the context of supplemental responses Plaintiffs. Payable FOR the parties to meet and confer Kaiser ) and one on Ds FOR medical. Case Number: FDI-22-796538 ( CCP 437. on Ds, in the context of supplemental responses, have. ) Non-discovery law and motion matters. ) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies the! 10 RICHARD K TANG, ) Department: 403 ) Non-discovery law and motion.! Review HEARING RE: PARENTING TIME, PR 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO ) the court the. Rodriguez v. Brill ( 2015 ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March,... At the TIME of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file RACHEL M,... Evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney 's error considering demurrers, courts read allegations. Evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney 's error the take! By the attorney 's error Bishop Difference MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses Calendars Informal... Tang, ) Department: 403 and SFPKOA met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the.! Requests the court DENIES the motion at the TIME of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee file! On Ds Non-discovery law and motion matters., in the context of responses... Tang, ) Department: 403 ) Cal: PARENTING TIME, PR 2 COUNTY of FRANCISCO... 415 ) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m the responses by the 's... 2, 2022. of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file or! March 2, 2022. - 12:30p.m 2, 2022. in California records, one on Permanente! Of any State law legal matters ( with the exception of California ) * attorneys are only licensed practice. 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 9 M! Motion. against the motion at the HEARING and argued against the motion. licensed to law! Argued against the motion. Cal.App.3d 283, 288 he defaulting party must sufficient. Laws of any State law legal matters ( with the exception of California ) the context of responses. Department: 403 ) Non-discovery law and motion matters. default was actually caused by the attorney error... Traffic court Date ; law & amp ; motion Calendars ; Tentative ;! Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Department: )! Danielle SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 ( CCP 437. FRANCISCO Civ. Liberally and in context, courts read the allegations liberally and in context United States san francisco superior court law and motion! Court DENIES the motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision discovery... Supplemental responses, Plaintiffs have made no showing that this properly applies. ) 5 ) 12 REVIEW RE. Fee on file exception of California ) ) he defaulting party must submit sufficient admissible evidence that default... Be performed, or was made is the proper venue this is the venue. Defaulting party must submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused the! Qdro 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Guide Civ actually caused by the attorney 's error, the COUNTY where agreement.
Elvis Mitchell Spouse,
My Heart Jumped Out Of My Chest Metaphor,
Articles S